Applying changes made during the COVID-19 pandemic to the future: trauma and orthopaedics

The NHS has made significant changes to practice and specialty training in trauma and orthopaedics as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. This article looks at the positive and innovative changes along with lessons learnt, which could affect policies in a new challenging post-pandemic health service. At a national level, Public Health England, the British Orthopaedic Association and the Royal Colleges have issued a number of guidelines, which have evolved throughout the pandemic. Developing resilient rotas, virtual clinics, teleconsultations, webinar-based training and operating theatre reorganisation are just some examples of how collaborative working has led to positive changes, despite the huge challenges and hardships created by COVID-19. As we emerge from this crisis, the field of trauma and orthopaedics will need to prepare for the challenges of patient backlogs, neglected trauma and long waiting lists. A continuation of the innovative and collaborative working seen during the pandemic will be crucial to cope with the post-COVID-19 world of orthopaedics.

An interfaith dialogue with Sir William Osler: crossing the divide of COVID-19 pandemic.

With the recent COVID-19 pandemic and George Floyd protests, the USA (US) has become extensively polarized across social and political divides. The COVID-19 pandemic has left tens of thousands dead and several million American citizens without work. Furthermore, the months of quarantine and uncertainty with the COVID-19 virus impacted the economic stability and health of Americans. In recent weeks, the divides have only deepened with the death of George Floyd from police brutality, which ushered in worldwide protests addressing racial, social, and law enforcement issues for minority groups. Both developments have ushered in unprecedented challenges for addressing social disparities while controlling the spread and devastation of the COVID-19 pandemic. With social media and mass communication, polarization between opposing groups has only deepened the divide. An inclusive dialogue that recognizes the intellectual and interpersonal boundaries of opposing groups would provide an avenue towards mutual understanding and further collaboration towards a common goal and solution. A physician that exemplified many aspects interfaith dialogue in his clinical practice and personal life was the late Sir William Osler. This will be accomplished through a fictional dialogue between Sir William Osler and Dr. Mark Webb.